Throughout
this module we have been constantly faced with issues surrounding our ever
evolving society, the role of technology and how the two form together to
create a relationship.
Verbeek, P . (2006) - “because of the pervasive role of technologies in our daily lives,
it is hard to find an activity or experience which is not technologically
mediated”.
Ultimately Verbeek is implying technology can be found within every aspect
of our lives - encouraging us to question whether perhaps without realising it
technology has taken over control of us.
If
we take a glance at modern western society of today it is clear to see we are surrounded
by technology. We are constantly using the power of technology to function
within our daily lives. Relying on it to complete even the most basic tasks. For
example on average who actually wakes up now days using an actual alarm clock
or do you use your smart phone to do so?
Technology
has advanced so much even over the past two years it’s a scary thought thinking
where we might be in lets say ten year time. It seems life a lifetime ago when
people would write letters to each instead of sending a quick text or email. Or
perhaps waiting a whole twenty four hours to get an update on the current
affairs of the world where now we can get constant updates second by second via
News apps on our smart phones or social media sites such as Twitter and
Facebook. Years ago time passed in fairly large units, everything was slower
and perhaps more appreciated. A few hours wasn’t considered a long time to go
between not talking to your friends or work colleagues or checking your email.
According
to figures collected by a screen lock app, the average user checks their phone
around one hundred and ten times a day (Mail Online, 2013). This figure is unbelievable, and makes us question as
humans do we rely on technology to much? Perhaps we have forgotten what life
used to be like without technology?
Latour (2002) as cited by Poel and Royakkers (2011)
“Without technological detours the properly human cannot exists”.
I do think Bruno Latour is very much correct
and believe as humans we have now become immersed within new media and
technology resulting in a change in social conventions and expectations of
life. For example it is considered peculiar and abnormal now a days if you do
not have a smart phone (most commonly iPhone – apple domination).
The
power of persuasive technology is incredibly strong, as it does appear to play
an affect in our every day lives, as there is quite literally an app for
everyone. The most common apps used are social media apps such as, Facebook,
Twitter, Instagram. Many of us now feel the need to update our Twitter or
Facebook status when something changes in our lives. Suggesting maybe we are
living more in ‘virtual online worlds’ instead of the real world.
It
is clear to see society has changed but is it just the new generation who have
followed and engaged with new media and modern technology. Or have older
generations also followed? Meaning all our past ways of life have been completely
vanished.
I
think many of us would disagree and say our past ways of life haven’t been completely
vanished. But ask yourself this,
When
was the last time you bought a cd instead of downloading it via iTunes or
listening on Spotify?
Do
you still get all your holiday pictures developed at the photo printers? Or do
you upload them onto Facebook in albums only printing select pictures.
And
when was the last time you went to Blockbusters to rent a DVD or do you now just
watch it online via Netflixs?
Society
has changed, and clearly new technologies have drastically improved our lives
in many aspects but - have we also lost part of our old lives that we will never
get back?
Persuasive
technology has become so immersed within our lives it’s affecting us in places
that we don’t even realise. Popularity is now rated on number or retweets or
followers on Twitter or the amount of Facebook likes on your chosen profile
picture. Language has even been adapted new phrases such as ‘selfie’ was even
adopted by the online version of Oxford English Dictionary in 2013 (Oxforddictionaries.com, 2014). The fast
pace nature of technology was mirrored in other phrases such as ‘lol’ ‘cbb’ and
‘brb’.
I
wondered if this new social way of communicating was the same for everyone? Do
different age groups have a different way of connecting?
To
answer my question I devised my ethnography project on researching the reliance
humans have with their smart phones and new media technology and the social
conventions and etiquette that come hand in hand with social media.
If
you go anywhere in Western society of today it will be the social norm to see
people staring at their smart phones. I can predict half of the people that you
see staring at the little square screens will not be using their smart phones to
contact someone instead they will be using their phone to browse. Browsing upon
either social media sites finding out what their peers are up to or surfing the
Internet finding out about the world news or even just playing a game to pass
the time. This form of browsing to fill time has turned into a human habit, and
is now considered to be a life style choice – we are choosing to be obsessed
with our smart phones we are allowing the media to control us let us. The new
generation in particular do not know any different they were born into a media
obsessed world.
I
can account for this, I feel lost without my phone almost the feeling of being
naked when I leave the house without it by mistake or when the battery dies.
Shutting down the constant contact and update with the world causes upset
within me which in a way encompasses the need society have with technology and
their smart phones.
For
my ethnography project I used participant observation to gather my information.
I observed different people all from different age groups over the time period
of one hour.
Why did I do this you ask?
I wanted to calculate the amount of time individuals interacted with their phone while in my company and what the purpose was for each individual for doing so. My aim was to see if there was a correlation between age and reliance humans have on their smart phones.
Why did I do this you ask?
I wanted to calculate the amount of time individuals interacted with their phone while in my company and what the purpose was for each individual for doing so. My aim was to see if there was a correlation between age and reliance humans have on their smart phones.
I
observed five participants in total meaning a total of five different age
groups took part; my younger sister Olivia 15, my best friend Megan who has
just recently turned 20, my auntie Jo who is 28, my mum Lorraine 47 and last
but not least my nan Lorraine 68. I
predicted there would be a correlation with the youngest age group using their
phone the most and the oldest the least.
But
what did I find out you are asking?
Well as predicted I was
correct. However there was also surprising outcomes which were found. Olivia
the youngest of the participants fulfilled to all expectations using her phone
the most she constantly
had her phone held in her hand, and when I attempted to look she became very
closed off and secretive suggesting she values her phone with the highest
importance. This valuing was also clearly present with her quick constant replies
to any alert she received, as well as constant scrolling checking for updates
on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Whatsapp.
Continuing
my ethnography project I also used Facebook one of the most popular social
media sites, to gain an understanding of the social rules and etiquettes of the
technology world and if different rules apply to different age groups. I kept
the same participants as before and commented on each of their profile pictures
saying ‘you look great here”.
Not all of them replied unfortunately
however here are the replies from the ones that did. The younger generations
Megan and Olivia understood I was joking straight away where as the older
generations misunderstood the joke. This suggests the older generations are
still getting to grips with the technology world.
Perhaps different age
groups have different social techniques on social networking?
Maybe society involvement with
technology has adapted the way we communicate to each other – are older generations
more sincere?
Des freedman claims “social
media, online platforms, digital technologies and collaborative networks have
fundamentally changed the ways we socialise, amuse ourselves” (Freedman, 2008) .
But do we really understand
how much information we are giving away just from interacting with social media
and online platforms. Yes we all understand the basic meaning
of persuasive technology but do we understand the extent that it is affecting
our lives. Surveillance has been and is currently
expanding. In today’s society is not just gathered from
medical records, census data, employment records or even CCTV. Information is
constantly being gathered and representations of us as individuals are being
formed. Information is gathered from all aspects of our lives from our Internet
web history to loyalty cards in supermarkets. Our world is based upon a
voyeuristic outlook and has been this way for many years. As humans natural instinct
is to observe and learn.
However has surveillance combined with modern technology gone a step to far?
However has surveillance combined with modern technology gone a step to far?
If we know surveillance is taking place on
simple aspects of life such as smart phone apps and supermarket loyalty cards
and our web history.
What surveillance
is taking place without our knowledge?
And
another important question... what information if being gathered? And why?
Our lives if we like it or not have become immersed with technology some may argue this has caused problems but ultimately we would of not achieved some of the world’s biggest achievements and attributes if it wasn’t for technology. This does not however mean technology is controlling us and we live in a technology determined world, in fact I believe to a certain extent we are controlling technology we choose to let it in to our lives, we choose how we apply it to our lives. Yes society has changed because of the advances in technology such as surveillance but everything needs to change once in a while. Change should be viewed a in positive way, culture survives on change and our world survives due to culture.
Biblography
Freedman, D. 2008. The politics of media policy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Oxforddictionaries.com. 2014. selfie: definition of selfie in Oxford dictionary (British & World English). [online] Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/selfie [Accessed: 2 Apr 2014]
Poel, I. V. D. and Royakkers, L. M. M. 2011. Ethics, Technology, and Engineering. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Verbeek, P. (2006). 'Persuasive Technology and Moral Responsibility: Toward an ethical framework for persuasive technologies.' Paper given at the First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-being, The Netherlands, May 18-19, 2006. Avalilable from" http://www.utwente.nl.gw/wijsb/organization/verbeek/verbeek_persuasive06.pdf
Our lives if we like it or not have become immersed with technology some may argue this has caused problems but ultimately we would of not achieved some of the world’s biggest achievements and attributes if it wasn’t for technology. This does not however mean technology is controlling us and we live in a technology determined world, in fact I believe to a certain extent we are controlling technology we choose to let it in to our lives, we choose how we apply it to our lives. Yes society has changed because of the advances in technology such as surveillance but everything needs to change once in a while. Change should be viewed a in positive way, culture survives on change and our world survives due to culture.
Biblography
Freedman, D. 2008. The politics of media policy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Oxforddictionaries.com. 2014. selfie: definition of selfie in Oxford dictionary (British & World English). [online] Available at: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/selfie [Accessed: 2 Apr 2014]
Poel, I. V. D. and Royakkers, L. M. M. 2011. Ethics, Technology, and Engineering. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Verbeek, P. (2006). 'Persuasive Technology and Moral Responsibility: Toward an ethical framework for persuasive technologies.' Paper given at the First International Conference on Persuasive Technology for Human Well-being, The Netherlands, May 18-19, 2006. Avalilable from" http://www.utwente.nl.gw/wijsb/organization/verbeek/verbeek_persuasive06.pdf




